Tuesday, November 22, 2011

The Alcalde: Scenes from the last Hex Rally

http://alcalde.texasexes.org/2011/11/hexrally-ignitestwitter/

Photo courtesy @joeymichelle, Twitter

Those of you who didn't attend large universities with storied athletic programs (i.e. football) may not get what the big deal is in the above link. You might find it silly or even a complete waste of time. To myself and many others, it reminds us of what makes college unique and fun.

The Hex Rally is the University of Texas' annual pep rally the Monday immediately preceding the big game against in-state rival, Texas A&M University. The two of us don't like each other much. Perhaps you saw the recent ESPN doc, "Roll Tide/War Eagle," detailing the Alabama/Auburn rivalry. Yeah, our respective fans that circle the fringe of the bowl are a lot like that, too. For the rest of us, the game's ultimate outcome has a lot to do with bragging rights for the next 364 days with family, friends, co-workers, Pastors. Most of which will occur over Thanksgiving left-overs.

My first Hex Rally experience came during my Freshman year, 1999. Lest you think us all heathens at the University of Texas, the tone and purpose of the Rally that year took a complete 180 as a result of the tragic events that occurred only days prior with the collapse of A&M's bonfire tower, their own tradition celebrating the big game. The two communities joined hands in Austin and, together, mourned the unnecessary loss of young life. We're rivals, not monsters.

With A&M's pending departure to the SEC, this should prove to be the final Hex Rally for a while. At least against the Aggies. Perhaps it'll be the Horned Frogs we hex next Thanksgiving. Or the Mountaineers? Huh. But even though the Hex Rally tradition only clocks-in at 26-years old, it's still one of the bits of uniqueness of college life that's getting trampled by conference realignment.

Never mind the game itself that's been played 118 times.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Sports Journal: Childhood Heroes

The recent Chicago Cubs shake-up had baseball great Ryne Sandberg's name sprinkled in the headlines. Sandberg was my childhood hero. This got me thinking, how do we pick our heroes and, if I were a kid today, who would be my Sports Hero?

I know where my obsession with Sandberg was originally influenced. My dad grew up in Chicago, followed the Cubs, witnessed the '69 season, and loved Ernie Banks. He loved that man. And he loved his passion for the game. I can't tell you how many times I heard my pop emphatically say with a wide smile, "Let's play two!" That made its appearance during many a Little League game he coached.

Reflecting on those three little words, they perfectly embodied my dad's outlook on life. "If one is good, two's even better!" Whatever the idea was, he wanted to kick it up a notch. The first image that comes to mind is when he planned our family trip to Europe, a trip 20-years in the making. He planned a three-week trek that touched four separate countries...by car. People's eyes got big when he told them we drove in Paris, let alone Rome. We bounced around Germany, Austria, and circled Italy. All navigated by his scrawny, goofy 18-year old co-pilot.

That was my dad. The can-do mindset and impassioned attitude of "Let's play two" was his physical embodiment.

One of my earliest memories is going to visit my grandfather, my dad's dad, and watching Cubs games with him. He punished himself by being a Cubs fan, too. He was retired by the 1980s and I remember watching many an afternoon game at his side, each in our own recliner. Just like grandpa, an ice-cold can of Pepsi in one hand and in the other a Hostess Ding Dong cake from the freezer, because they're better that way. And that's where the obsession with Sandberg was born for a young Chris.

Sandberg, he always struck me as the strong, silent type. He was the John Wayne of second base.

He put up many a season of fantastic numbers. He was a leader of men. He got his uniform dirty in what seemed like every game. But he didn't run his mouth. He wasn't flashy. He was damn good at what he did and throngs of fans adored him, but none of it ever seemed to go to his head. Of course SportsCenter and corporate endorsements weren't then what they are now, but I think character remains the same regardless.

It was that sort of character that I did not one, but two separate biographical reports on in grade school. Long before the wiki-anything days rolled around, I tried to glean as much information as I could from a combination of Beckett Magazine, Sports Illustrated, and the backs of baseball cards. Thinking about it, I'm not sure how I squeaked out enough information for the required minimum of pages. Twice.

And speaking of ball cards, between my dad and I, one of our regular male-bonding occurrences became baseball card shows. Lots of them. And my hero Sandberg became the focus. Upper Deck, Fleer Ultra, Topps Desert Shield Edition, Denny's Grand Slam Holographic Limited Editions...as the options exploded, so did the collection of Sandberg cards. Remember how my old man liked to take it to 11? The collection grew from several pages to over 2,000 cards. My dad was responsible for the vast majority of that total. At one point, his job had him covering sales from Atlanta to Chattanooga and he knew where every ball card shop was between the two, many of which he arranged to have on the look-out for #23's cards specifically for him to pick up.

That massive collection paid off in a way I never could have imagined. Flash forward several years to 1996. I'm in my mid-teens. My dad and I are attending a Braves home game against the Cubs. We're set to sit in the cheap seats, but prior to first pitch, dad says, "how about we go down by the Cubs dugout?" Alright, why not. This is the good ol' days, when staff wasn't stationed at every aisle, ready to keep everyone separated by ticket caste.

So we're walking down the steps toward the dugout, passing all the business types and season ticket holders that are ordering things that are far too fancy for a baseball game from personal waiters. We get right up to the edge of the dugout and my old man is able to lock eyes with Manager Jim Riggleman, standing at the top of the steps.

"Hey, Jim, my son is a huge fan of Sandberg. He's go over 2,000 of his ball cards. Would he sign his glove?"

Wha?!? I'm looking at my old man, wondering what the hell is going on here. Where did this come from?

Then I see Riggleman look down into the dugout and say, "Hey, Sandberg. Some kid up here says he's got 2,000 of your cards!"

Next thing I know, Riggleman is motioning for me to toss him my ball glove. I think I forgot I was holding it.

I manage to toss it through the air and see it land in his hands on the other side. It then disappears into the dugout.

At this point, the usher for the section has seen the glove go into the air and is getting wise to our trespassing. He comes over and my dad starts explaining that his kid just wants a simple autograph. And he can't leave without his glove.

I'm watching this transpire...and it's then that it happens. Ryno himself appears at the top of the dugout, my glove in his hand, and tosses it back to me. Slack-jawed, somehow I caught it and stammered out a "thank you" at the same time.

We're clearing out of the fancy-pants section and there it was, on my well-worn Little League glove, the one that saw many years at second base: Sandberg's signature. That glove officially retired on that day.

When I think about Sandberg and describe him here, I can see how I've emulated him over the years: dedication to work, honesty, shying from the spotlight. Sure, we pick heroes usually because we want to walk in their footsteps, but is it possible that we also pick them because we're drawn to individuals with shared traits or personalities? Are we and our heroes kindred spirits?

That in mind, if I were 8-years old today, who would be my Sandberg?

Someone who comes to mind is another second baseman. The Red Sox's Dustin Pedroia embodies that franchise's hard-working roots. That guy is filthy before he can get out of the 1st. He takes care of both sides of the ball and shows he has a true love and respect for the game. I could see amassing a folder of ball cards on this guy.

Another athlete I love to see play is Kevin Durant. Sure, we share the same Alma mater, but even if we didn't, I'd still see the passion he plays with for the game. And, yes, he has huge endorsements, but it comes across in a very different way from someone like Kobe. Man, Kobe is great, but he just looks and acts like the type of guy that'd take great joy in getting to punch you right in the sack.

On the court, Durant looks like a big kid who appreciates how lucky he is to play a kid's game for a very good living. He seems like a guy who just gets it, as recently witnessed when he played a pick-up game of flag football with a bunch of college kids. Was it a pub-stunt? Maybe, but it was a fun one. Which fan wouldn't want to play in that game?

Growing up, a lot of kids I knew loved the flash of stars like Mark McGwire and Jose Canseco. Those guys remind me of current-day players like Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Howard, or even the recent Manny Ramirez.  I'm just not drawn to those guys. Not that each of them aren't talents, but I don't find myself rooting for them, and maybe it's because I don't believe I share personal traits with them. And I'm apparently not a fan of the long-ball hitter.

Within the realm of personal hero talk, I often hear people take a negative slant and say you'll only end up disappointed by them, because they're not who you think they truly are. I'd say that as long as we all take a look at the whole picture of the heroes we pick, which includes how they relate to us and our own values, what they say, and what they really do, then we're far less likely to end up feeling we'll ultimately be betrayed. And we'll all have heroes to help guide us and provide positive influence.

Friday, November 4, 2011

MLB All-Star Game

Dear Mr. Selig:

End the practice that the League who wins the MLB All-Star Game is award home field advantage in the World Series. The All-Star Game is an inconsequential game that is meant to entertain 12-year old boys. It shouldn't play into deciding the fate of the last two teams standing in October because MLB tries to tack-on some sort of TV ratings-driven meaning to it.

Let the team with the best overall record claim home field in the World Series. And to make it even more responsible, make the format 2-2-1-1-1.

Is this shit really that hard to get taken care of?

Thanks,

Baseball Fans

LA Times: Villaraigosa asks baseball to pick local owner for Dodgers

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/11/villaraigosa-asks-baseball-to-pick-local-owner-for-dodgers.html

Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa issued the following declaration: “Dodger fans and all Angelenos deserve an owner who loves and believes in this city, who understands that the Dodgers and their historic baseball stadium are not just a team; they are a collective community asset.” [he wrote to the commissioner.]

1) They are not a "collective community asset." They are not the Green Bay Packers. You might really like them, even love them, and really want them to win, but they belong to the owner(s). 2) They have only been a "community asset" since 1962, when the original owner came with them from NYC. And they seemed to do alright.

The Mayor continued: “I understand that Major League Baseball is a business first and the outcome of any auction and final decisions must be fiscally successful for all.  However, I urge you to weigh heavily the merits of local ownership.”

No. In fact, I put forth the argument that local ownership is a very low priority.

The Dodgers need, even deserve, a complete culture change and new direction. They've been saddled with a pair of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum owners for the better part of the last decade and need to be freed from that mire. And that mire was influenced by the cesspool that is the "LA Culture" of self-indulgence and me-me-me attitude. Someone from the outside, who will always remain vigilant and resist the Reality TV Star identity, is exactly what the Dodgers need. Someone from outside the LA bubble.

Priority number one is someone that is passionate about baseball and expects the best from their players and their entire organization. The thought often occurs to me that many East Coasters move to Los Angeles because they know they can use their domineering attitudes to rule native, laid-back Californians like kings. If the future owner is local, my guess is that chances are slim they're originally from here. Not sure that jives with the underlying theme of what Tony is saying above.

Another important priority is breaking with the past. The biggest change that needs to happen would also be the most-controversial: demolish Dodger Stadium. It is terrible. I haven't enjoyed a single seating area in the stadium; I'm either the length of a football field away from the action or I'm baking in the sun on a crummy bleacher with no breeze. And this comes from someone who attended dozens of games yearly at the multipurpose, function-over-style Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium.

Dodger Stadium has got to go. The Dodgers need to work out a situation where they play as long as it takes in either a time-share situation in Anaheim or at the Coliseum. In that time, tear the stadium down to the ground and start over. First, turn the whole stadium around and have it face the city. Who decided the visual attraction beyond the outfield should be a non-descript section of barren hillside instead of a bustling metropolis? Then go about building the all-important corporate suites and exclusive dining clubs, but subtract about 8-10,000 seats and bring them all closer to the field. And for God's sake, cover the bleachers with more than a tin roof. With the space saved from the smaller footprint, build an actual place for the "collective community" to gather around the stadium, both before and after games. And build it on the stadium grounds. Instead of pouring more pavement, build restaurants, bars, and condominiums. Something akin to the neighborhoods around Yankee Stadium, Fenway, and Wrigley. Build Dodgerville, for crying out loud!

The other big priority I'll mention here is rebuilding the farm system. The Dodgers are not going to have a lot of play money for a long time, because it's all going to be wrapped up in buying the damn thing. They won't be able to sign big-time free agents, just like they haven't the last two years of the McCourt Reign. They have to harvest from within, and that means well-structured farm teams with plentiful pools of talent. And the talent has to be attracted by one thing: an owner committed to excellence and winning.

If all of that can come from someone who is "local," great, but, for me, it doesn't matter which city that sort of ambition and determination calls home.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

ESPN: Mark Cuban interested in Dodgers

http://espn.go.com/los-angeles/mlb/story/_/id/7182604/dallas-mavericks-mark-cuban-interested-los-angeles-dodgers-right-price

Ding! Dong! The witch is dead. That was the sentiment I read and heard from all over L.A. today. Frank McCourt finally agrees to sell auction the Dodgers. Good riddance. He set the organization back a decade and thumbed his nose at the very Dodger fans that propped-up his unsustainable lifestyle.

The most surprising thing I read/heard from Dodger fans today: an overwhelming interest in Mark Cuban as the new owner.

Win a NBA Championship and people start to see what you can do for their city, their team.

I love Cubes as an owner. He believes in his guys and his staff. When people said he should trade Dirk, he stuck with him and put his faith in him. When people called the Mavs too soft, he made them tougher. He has passion for the sport. He wants to win. And he loves his fans. Cuban would be great for baseball; he would breathe fresh life into the game. He'd make it more interesting. And he'd do the most-important thing for a franchise like the Dodgers: make them relevant.

I'll repeat, I'm not a Lakers fan by any stretch, but I have a lot of respect for the kind praise Jeanie Buss heaped on Cubes:

"Mark is dedicated to his team and his fan base," Buss said. "Some may say he goes over the top but there is a direct correlation between season ticket renewals and the faith fans have in ownership.


"He has put his reputation on the line for his team so fans feel comfortable devoting their time and resources to the Mavs because he does. When I hear someone criticize Mark, I ask them to name the person who owned the team before him. They never can."

Not often you read that kind of praise from one of your biggest rivals.

I was disappointed when Cuban didn't get a shot at buying the Cubs. I was a little bummed when he didn't get the Rangers. Ultimately, one of those is clearly in good hands, the other appears to be setting themselves on the right path. Right now, I can't root for the Dodgers, but I am very intrigued by what he could do for them overall. One day, MLB will let him in to their club. If he's so interested, my one and only concern is that it doesn't affect his first love in Dallas.

ESPN: Mike Quade out as Cubs manager

I read this: http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/7182270/chicago-cubs-release-manager-mike-quade

And inside it came this:

Epstein said. "We are looking for someone with whom and around whom we can build a foundation for sustained success. The next manager must have leadership and communication skills; he must place an emphasis on preparation and accountability; he must establish high standards and a winning culture; he must have integrity and an open mind; and he must have managerial or coaching experience at the major league level."

That means candidates would be....well, Bobby Cox and Joe Torre are done, right?  Current voice of the Cubs, Bob Brenly? Or, gosh, are they getting the band back together? Terry Francona?

How about a smidgen of hope for my childhood leader? Nope. Also in was this:

"Theo called me 10 minutes after they issued the press release (on Quade) and told me that they have a list of guys and I'm not on it,'' Sandberg said, according to the Daily Herald. "He wished me good luck and said he hoped I got a chance somewhere soon."


Did Theo say that last part with a nudge and a wink, because ten minutes later came this news: http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/7182684/philadelphia-phillies-give-st-louis-cardinals-ok-talk-ryne-sandberg-source-says

Sandberg. Managing in the big leagues. As a St. Louis Cardinal. Whoa, whoa, whoa.

I think Theo handled the situation well, but, geeze, Sandberg as a Cardinal. That makes me feel all weird and conflicted. But at the same time I'd love to see it. For Ryno. And for baseball.

I'd like to see the Cubs manager in place soon. Not sure how many guys are out there with that resume.

Sports Concussions

I'm missing something.

Pittsburgh Penguins star Sidney Crosby has been out of action since January of this year due to a concussion. He just started skating in November, taking lite contact. He isn't expected to rejoin his team until sometime next month.

Meanwhile, NFL players suffer concussions and they're lucky if they sit out an entire week.

Does the NFL rush players back into action because of the money involved? It's not like there's a quantum difference between the hits that NFL and NHL players take.

What's the deal?

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

NFL: Midway Point

Week eight of the 2011-2012 NFL regular season just wrapped last night, concluding the first half. Unless something amazing happens in the second half, this is where I see things standing:

Legit shot at a trip to Indy:
Green Bay Packers
Pittsburgh Steelers

Need to get their act in gear:
Philadelphia Eagles
New England Patriots

Toying with a playoff spot:
Detroit Lions
New Jersey Jets

Making it in simply by not losing the division:
San Francisco 49ers
Kansas City Chiefs

Outside chance at wasting space as a Wild Card:
Dallas Cowboys
Chicago Bears

Guess I see it playing out like this:

NFC
East: Philadelphia
North: Green Bay (#1 seed)
South: New Orleans
West: San Francisco 49ers
Wild Cards: New Jersey Giants, Detroit

AFC
East: Buffalo
North: Pittsburgh (#1 seed)
South: Houston
West: Kansas City
Wild Cards: New England, Baltimore

After this Sunday's games (10.30.11), it's kinda hard not to picture an all-Pennsylvanian Super Bowl coming together in Indianapolis. The Steelers shut down the Patriots and Philly was absolutely unstoppable on offense. If they continue to play that way, why the hell can't they make the title game?

NBA 2011-2012

November 1, 2011. This was to be tip-off evening of the 2011-2012 NBA season. But, well, money went and got involved and we're going to have to wait a little longer for professional basketball while this lockout continues.

In the meantime, SportsCenter was so down in the dumps they played a 20-minute sit-down interview with Les Miles and showed complete-game recaps from NBA Opening Night...2010.

As a Dallas Mavericks fans, I was most looking forward to the presentation of the Championship rings and the hoisting of the 2010-2011 banner high above the American Airlines Center. That'll come another night, but it's one that I'm really excited to see. In the meantime, since the season hasn't started, the Mavs aren't defending anything; they're the NBA Champs. And it's that way until they figure this thing out.

And until it gets figured out, we'll have plenty of football to tide us over throughout the week as this is the time of year when we're bound to find either a college or professional game on nearly any night. College basketball will kick off in marathon fashion within the next week.  And there's always hockey, too, which is the only professional sport that really doesn't give an F when it comes to streaming live play-by-play without some ridiculous subscription. They appear to be warmed by the simple joy that someone is listening. Anyone. And I'm happy they feel that way and that they're willing to share.

But wouldn't it have been a great transition in the last few days to go from the close of the World Series, into the football weekend, and right on into the kick-off of the NBA season?

As an NBA fan, here's hoping both sides come together, hash it all out, and get some ball going by the time the Super Bowl winds down. For the sake of the fans, for withstanding long, dull winters, and thousands, if not millions, of employees, small business, and communities that thrive and survive on the business of the NBA. We need you back in the game.

On the bright side, it's only about 100 days until pitchers and catchers report for Spring Training.